Would you like to view this website in another language?

Affordable Time Tracking Software: What to Look For and Avoid

Small business team reviewing weekly hours and overtime in a time tracking dashboard during a short meeting.

If “affordable” time tracking has ever turned into a surprise invoice, a messy payroll export, or a Monday morning spent chasing missing hours, you’re not alone. Small businesses usually don’t need fancy productivity graphs 👉 they need a simple way to capture hours accurately, apply basic rules (breaks and overtime), and get clean data into payroll without double entry. This guide shows you exactly what to look for in low-cost time tracking software, what to avoid (especially pricing traps), and how to pick the right type of tool for your team in minutes. First, let’s get the quick answer out of the way.

Quick answer: what’s the best affordable time tracking software for small businesses?

The “best” affordable option depends on how your team works and how clean you need payroll data to be. A simple timer might be fine for project work, but it can fall apart fast for hourly teams dealing with breaks, overtime, and approvals. Use this mini decision line to shortlist the right type of tool, then compare pricing and features inside that category.

Mini decision line (pick your lane):

  • Hourly shift teams → time clock + break/overtime rules + manager approvals
  • Project/service teams → billable time + projects/clients + budget reporting
  • Multi-location teams → shared kiosk/terminal + role permissions + consistent rules per site/department

The 60-second checklist (what to look for)

If you only read one section, make it this one: these checks stop “affordable” from turning into payroll chaos.

Essentials that make it “payroll-ready”

A payroll-ready system does more than capture hours. It helps you prove what happened (audit trail), apply rules consistently (breaks/overtime), and export data without manual clean-up. Official guidance is clear: employers need accurate records of hours worked and wages, and there’s no magic “one template” that excuses messy data.

Payroll-ready essentials (what you need in practice):

  • Clock in/out + breaks: start/end times and break capture (paid/unpaid if relevant)
  • Overtime handling: alerts when someone is approaching overtime and clear totals
  • Approvals: managers approve timesheets before payroll closes
  • Edits with an audit trail: who changed what, when, and why
  • Export options: CSV/Excel and/or payroll integrations, ideally per pay period
  • Locking/closing periods: prevents “late edits” after payroll is processed

Mini table: feature checklist you can scan in 20 seconds

Feature Why it matters for small businesses Red flag if missing
Timesheet approvals Stops “surprise hours” landing in payroll Anyone can edit after the fact with no sign-off
Break tracking Avoids overpay/underpay and break disputes Breaks tracked in WhatsApp notes or “remembered later”
Overtime alerts/totals Prevents accidental overtime and cost spikes You only see overtime after exporting to payroll
Edit history/audit trail Protects you in disputes and internal reviews Edited times overwrite the original with no record
Pay period export Saves admin time and reduces errors Exports are messy, inconsistent, or manual copy-paste
Timesheet locking Keeps payroll stable and predictable Staff can change last month’s hours any time

Real-world use case (hourly team):

  • A supervisor adjusts a missed clock-out from 17:00 to 16:10.
  • The system should require a reason (e.g., “left early, approved”), record the editor, and update totals instantly.
  • If your tool can’t show that chain of events, you’ll end up arguing from memory.
💡If you want payroll-ready time data without spreadsheet clean-up, Shiftbase lets employees clock in/out via desktop, mobile, or a clock terminal, and you can set punch-clock rules like rounding and auto-approving clocked timesheets where it fits your process.

Usability that drives adoption (employees won’t fight it)

Affordable tools fail when people don’t use them. Your goal is “boring and easy”: staff can clock in quickly, managers can approve quickly, and nobody needs a training session just to log a break. Buyer guides consistently flag usability, reporting, and integrations as make-or-break factors because they decide whether the tool saves time or adds admin.

✅ Usability checklist (what to test in a demo):

  • Mobile + web: does it work well on a phone and a desktop?
  • Fast clock-in: can a staff member clock in within 10 seconds?
  • “Forgot to clock out” flow: can staff request a fix, and can managers approve with one click?
  • Kiosk/terminal option (if relevant): shared device for on-site teams, without shared logins
  • Simple approvals: managers can approve a whole week/pay period, not one entry at a time
  • Smart reminders: prompts when someone is late clocking in/out (without spamming everyone)

Step-by-step adoption test (do this before you buy):

  1. Pick one employee and one manager for a 15-minute trial.
  2. Employee clocks in, takes a break, switches tasks (if relevant), then clocks out.
  3. Employee “forgets” to clock out and submits a correction request.
  4. Manager approves the day and exports a pay period sample.
  5. If any step feels confusing, your team will avoid it under pressure.

⚠️Quick warning: If the tool relies on manual timesheet entry as the default (instead of a clean clock-in/out flow), you’ll see “Friday afternoon guesswork” creep in.

Reporting + integrations (so you don’t do double work)

You don’t need 50 dashboards. You need a handful of reports that answer labour questions in minutes, plus integrations or exports that don’t break every pay period. Review platforms and comparison hubs push feature/pricing filters for a reason: two tools can look identical until you realise reporting or integrations are locked behind higher tiers.

Reports most SMEs actually use (and why):

  • Hours by employee (for payroll checks and fairness)
  • Overtime report (to spot who’s consistently going over and why)
  • Attendance/punctuality (late starts, early finishes, missed breaks)
  • Labour cost by location/role (where margins are being squeezed)
  • Project/job report (only if you bill time or track job costing)

Integration checklist (ask these before you commit):

  • Does it export per pay period (not just per week)?
  • Can you map hours to pay codes (regular, overtime, leave) if your payroll needs that?
  • Are integrations included in the price, or are they paid add-ons?
  • Is there a clean CSV/Excel fallback if an integration fails?
  • Can you restrict who can export or edit exported periods?

Real example: avoiding “integration tax”

  • Tool A is £X/month but charges extra for payroll exports, approvals, and multi-location reporting.
  • Tool B costs slightly more but includes the features you’ll actually use weekly.
  • In practice, Tool B is cheaper because you’re not paying with manager time and payroll corrections.

👉Main takeaway: If the reporting can’t answer overtime, attendance, and labour by location/role quickly (or if integrations are hidden behind upgrades) it’s not “affordable,” it’s just cheap up front.

What to avoid (where “affordable” becomes a trap)

Cheap tools can still cost you a fortune in admin time, payroll fixes, and team pushback if the pricing and controls are messy.

Pricing traps you can spot in 2 minutes

Most time tracking tools look affordable because the headline price is low — then the “must-have” bits live in higher tiers or paid add-ons. Capterra notes that small-business time tracking pricing is typically per user/month, and that “advanced” features like reporting, integrations, and automated alerts push costs up significantly.

🚩 The usual traps (watch for these on the pricing page):

  • Base fee + per-user pricing: sounds fine until you add supervisors, admins, and seasonal staff.
  • Paid essentials: approvals, audit trails, GPS/geofence, kiosk mode, overtime alerts.
  • Limits on exports/reports: only basic summaries unless you upgrade.
  • “Integration tax”: payroll/accounting integrations cost extra per month.
  • Feature gating by team size: “small business plan” has the features you need… until you grow from 15 to 25 staff.

Fast “true cost” formula (use this when comparing tools):

  • Monthly cost = (price per user × active users) + base fee + add-ons
  • Then add the hidden cost: manager admin hours × hourly wage (if exports and approvals are clunky)

Tiny vendor pricing questions checklist (copy/paste into demos):

  • What’s the starting price and the price at 25 users?
  • Are approvals, audit trail, and exports included in the plan you’re quoting?
  • Is kiosk mode included, or an add-on?
  • Is GPS/geofencing included, or an add-on?
  • Are payroll integrations included? If not, what’s the monthly fee?
  • Are there limits on reports, export rows, or export formats (CSV/Excel)?
  • What happens to data access/export if we downgrade?
💡 If you want to avoid paying extra for basics like approvals and payroll exports, Shiftbase supports approving worked hours and exporting reports (including a payroll report) to Excel/CSV for your payroll flow.

Trust traps (privacy + security) in one checklist

This is the stuff that causes employee complaints, security headaches, or “we can’t use this” conversations after rollout.

  • Transparent GPS rules: location captured only when clocking, with clear employee notice (no continuous tracking).
  • Role-based access: staff can’t see other people’s hours; supervisors only see their teams.
  • MFA available: multi-factor authentication for anyone who can approve/edit/export.
  • Audit logs: edits are traceable (who/what/when).
  • Data retention + exports: you can export what you need for payroll and keep records clean.
  • No shared logins on kiosks: individual PINs/badges, not “tablet password for everyone”.
  • Secure recovery process: admins can reset access safely without workarounds.

For security, MFA is one of the simplest high-impact controls and the UK’s NCSC provides guidance on implementing strong multi-factor authentication for corporate services.
For time and pay records, the U.S. Department of Labor highlights that employers must keep accurate records of hours worked and wages earned.

Pick the right type of tool (simple match)

Choosing gets easier when you match the tool to how work actually happens in your business.

If you run hourly shifts (retail, hospitality, care)

If shifts drive your day, then you need time tracking that behaves like a time clock, not a project timer.

Then prioritise:

  • Kiosk/terminal option for on-site clock-ins (plus mobile for managers/field roles)
  • Scheduling tie-in so planned vs actual hours are visible
  • Break + overtime alerts so costs don’t surprise you at payroll
  • Manager approvals before the pay period closes
  • Multi-location controls (departments, locations, permissions)

Quick example (why this matters):
A staff member clocks in 12 minutes early for three shifts. Without rules/approvals, that “small” overrun becomes paid time. With approvals + clear reporting, you catch it weekly, not after payroll.

💡Shiftbase is built for shift-based teams with kiosk clocking and timesheet approvals, so managers can review and approve hours before exporting payroll data.

If you run remote/project teams

If you bill by time or run projects, your pain is usually “where did the hours go?” not “who clocked in late?”

Then prioritise:

  • Project/client tracking (billable vs non-billable)
  • Approval flow (submitted → approved → locked for invoicing/payroll)
  • Reporting by client/project (budget burn, recurring work, profitability)
  • Easy edits with audit history (so corrections don’t become arguments)

Step-by-step process you should be able to run weekly:

  1. Staff log time to a client/project (billable or non-billable).
  2. Manager reviews outliers (e.g., 6 hours “admin”).
  3. Timesheet is approved and locked.
  4. Export goes to payroll and/or invoicing.

If you’re multi-location or scaling

This is where “cheap” tools snap, because standardising rules across sites becomes a full-time job.

Then prioritise:

  • Permissions and roles (site manager vs regional manager vs payroll)
  • Standardised rules (rounding, break rules, overtime triggers)
  • Stronger reporting (hours and labour cost by location/department)
  • Consistent exports (same columns every pay period)

❗Simple rule: If you can’t answer “what did we spend on labour by location last week?” in two clicks, you’re scaling on guesswork.

Where Shiftbase fits (and when it’s the smarter ‘affordable’ choice)

If you’re done duct-taping a timer, spreadsheets, and last-minute approvals, you’re in Shiftbase territory.

Shiftbase tends to be the better-value choice when you need:

  • Time tracking for shift teams (mobile + kiosk)
  • Approvals for worked hours (day/week/month views)
  • Payroll-friendly exports (Excel/CSV payroll report)
  • Scheduling + time tracking in one flow
  • Absence management (requests, balances, restrictions)

If you want one place for scheduling, clock-ins, approvals, payroll exports, and absence requests, you can run that process in Shiftbase without jumping between tools. Try Shiftbase now 14 days for free.

Easily manage your employees' hours worked!
Easily manage your employees' hours worked!
  • Easily clock in and out
  • Automatic calculation of surcharges
  • Link with payroll administration
Try for free Request a demo

Frequently Asked Questions

  • The best option depends on whether you run shifts, projects, or multiple locations. Shift teams need clock-in/out, break rules, and approvals. Project teams need client/project tracking and budget reporting. Multi-location teams need permissions and standardised rules. Start by matching the tool type to your work pattern, then compare pricing and export quality.

  • It can be, if you only need basic timers for a tiny team and you’re not relying on clean payroll exports. The moment you need approvals, audit trails, overtime visibility, or structured exports, “free” often turns into manual admin. If payroll corrections are happening monthly, you’ve outgrown free.

  • Avoid tools that hide approvals or exports behind upgrades, allow edits without an audit trail, or push invasive tracking without clear employee controls. From a security angle, avoid anything that doesn’t support MFA for managers/admins. Those gaps create disputes, low adoption, and unnecessary risk.

  • Requirements vary by country and worker type, but the common theme is simple: you need accurate records of hours worked and wages earned. In the U.S., the Department of Labor explains there’s no required form, but employers must keep accurate hours and pay records for covered workers.

 

Time-tracking

Written by:

Rinaily Bonifacio

Rinaily is a renowned expert in the field of human resources with years of industry experience. With a passion for writing high-quality HR content, Rinaily brings a unique perspective to the challenges and opportunities of the modern workplace. As an experienced HR professional and content writer, She has contributed to leading publications in the field of HR.

Disclaimer

Please note that the information on our website is intended for general informational purposes and not as binding advice. The information on our website cannot be considered a substitute for legal and binding advice for any specific situation. While we strive to provide up-to-date and accurate information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information on our website for any purpose. We are not liable for any damage or loss arising from the use of the information on our website.

Save time with accurate time tracking

14 days trial, free support

  • Clock-in via app or punch clock
  • Gain insight into your personnel costs
  • Comprehensive reporting possibilities
Use Shiftbase on mobile